Affordable Textbooks Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
|
Limited Knowledge: How The High Cost Of Academic Journals Limits Public Access To Research
Limited_Knowledge.pdf
|
Executive Summary
The future of academic research is in peril. University budgets
are decreasing while the cost of academic journals is skyrocketing. As
a result, universities are unable to purchase vital journal
subscriptions that help boost the quality and success of new academic
research. Fortunately, new and innovative solutions are growing in
popularity and have the potential to change the future of academic
communication.
The Student PIRGs Support The Following Strategies:
High-Quality Low-Cost Journals
Faculty should try to publish their work in journals that will reach a
large audience and are low cost. When that is not possible, faculty
should try to retain key rights to their works when negotiating with
high cost publishers. Such rights allow faculty to distribute their
research to a broader audience and submit it to an institutional
repository.
Institutions should subscribe to high-quality, low-cost alternatives
whenever possible. When deciding tenure, university administrations
should consider all research published by a faculty member including
high-quality, low-cost and/or open access journals.Research
institutions, independent organizations and the federal government are
promoting strategies that show promise in lowering journal prices and
increasing access to research.
Open Access Journals
Faculty should try to publish in open access journals, online
publications that do not charge a subscription fee, but allow anyone to
read the material at no cost, usually through the Web. Instead, other
sources are sought to cover the cost of producing the journal. These
sources include establishing supporting endowments, sponsorship similar
in nature to those used in public broadcasting, or through fees for
“article process” charged to authors, their grants or institutions.
Open access peer-reviewed journals also have impact factors and
citation rates that, on average, are equal to or higher than
traditional peer-reviewed journals.1
Open Course Materials And Software
In 1999, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) launched
OpenCourseWare (OCW), a program MIT uses to make all of its course
materials available free online for anyone in the world.2 OCW had 1,100 courses published as of June 1, 2005.3 Rice University launched a similar site, Connexions, which grew from 200 modules to 2,300 in two years.4
Leverage Interlibrary Loan Systems
Interlibrary loaning programs allow multiple institutions to share
research materials through the Web or a manual delivery system. For
example, the University of California (UC) interlibrary loan system
allows a library to borrow or photocopy an article available in another
institution’s collections, thus providing access to research without
significant cost to the reader and capturing efficiencies in the way
materials are collected and shared.5
Create Permanent Institutional Archives
Administrators and librarians should create permanent standing archives
in which researchers at the institution can deposit their work. The
university system maintains the archive and makes available the
research stored within it over the Internet. This guarantees free
permanent access to the research produced by that university to the
university itself, other university systems and the public.
Bulk Purchasing
Institutions should purchase journals in consortia with other
universities to help lower subscription prices. In 2002, the UC
campuses, negotiating in consortia through the California Digital
Library, saved $27 million dollars.6
After purchasing the information, each of the UC schools had access to
it through the Internet. Bulk purchasing lowers the prices and
maintains user access to vital research. UC budget materials give
dramatic evidence of the advantages of library resource sharing,
reporting that if campus libraries independently were to negotiate for,
license, and catalog the 10,000 journal titles and 250 databases in the
system wide digital collection, they would have to spend an additional
$34 million per year.7
Publicly Funded Research Available To The Public
The creation of central, standing archives for publicly funded research
allow free access to valuable information, benefiting universities,
government agencies, and the general public.
Individual professors, universities and organizations dedicated to
increasing access to research have successfully made initial steps
towards solving this problem by implementing one or more of the
strategies described here, but more rigorous change is needed in order
to balance the public’s need for advanced research and the publishers’
profits.
1 “Support Publishing Experiments and New Business Models.” Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California.
2 “MIT OpenCourseWare.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1 Aug. 2005.
3 Ibid.
4 “Really Open Source.” Inside Higher Ed. News. 29 July 2005.
5 “Getting Materials Not Held in the UCSD Libraries.” University of California, San Diego Libraries. 24 Aug. 2004.
6 Ibid.
7 University of California 2005-06 Budget for Current Operations. Nov. 2004. pg. 185.
|