Mayor John Hickenlooper
is all about the green: He has an initiative to plant a million trees
by 2025, a leafy jacket and his Greenprint Denver plan to prove it. But
students on the Auraria campus are trying to one-up him by building the
largest solar-energy project on a college campus outside of California,
and the fifth-largest in the country. By placing photovoltaic panels on
the roofs of the Central Classroom and library buildings, they plan to
generate 750 kilowatts of solar power, which would offset about 3
percent of the energy used on campus -- on top of the 45 percent that
already comes from wind.
On May 30, they'll find out if the Public Utilities Commission is going to quash their effort.
Plans for the solar project began last summer when California-based 3
Phases Energy Services approached the head of Auraria facilities
management, Jim Fraser. The company specializes in developing and
coordinating solar projects and was looking to respond to Xcel Energy's
Solar*Rewards program, which pays customers for energy they generate
from solar panels.
Since Colorado voters approved Amendment 37 in 2004, requiring that 10
percent of retail electricity sales come from renewable sources by
2015, Xcel created such incentive programs to help it meet the new
standard. Last year the utility put out a request for proposals to
solar developers such as 3 Phases, seeking potential projects from
which Xcel could buy renewable-energy credits.
In an REC deal, the actual electricity produced is separated from the
benefits of producing that electricity in an environmentally sound way,
so that companies such as Xcel can purchase the benefits, but not
necessarily the electricity. The company can then use those credits,
which equal one per megawatt hour of electricity, to meet their
requirement for renewable energy.
"We find a customer and help them understand the incentives from Xcel,"
says Tim Derrick of 3 Phases, who saw a lot of potential on Auraria's
rooftops.
Fraser agreed, and they worked together to put in a bid to Xcel. In
August, it was selected. They then had to sell the idea to the Auraria
Board, which oversees the management of the campus. So Fraser enlisted
the help of Lindsey Gavioli, head of the University of Colorado at
Denver's chapter of the Colorado Public Interest Research Group.
Gavioli and Fraser sat down with representatives of Xcel and 3 Phases
to produce a cost analysis. They found that with an outside investor
agreeing to pay for the $5 million project, and 3 Phases owning the
array and selling the energy back to Auraria, the campus's only
financial commitment was covering the rate increase from coal and gas
to solar. But the new rate would be fixed over twenty years, and thus
feasibly save the campus money in the future, since coal and gas rates
are expected to rise. After that twenty-year period, they'd have the
option to purchase the array so that the campus could generate its own
power -- direct from the sun -- at a minimal cost.
About a dozen students took the information and gathered petition
signatures from 500 of their peers and obtained letters of support from
the faculties, administrations and student governments of the three
schools that share the campus.
In November, Gavioli went before the Auraria Board asking for the
project's approval and for campus administration to cover the initial
increase in power costs -- expected to be about $50,000 over the first
eight years -- so that students would not be impacted. In December, the
members approved the project and agreed to cover the bill. "It's just
been very exciting," Gavioli says. "Essentially, the only reason this
thing passed is because we students jumped on board with this and ran
with it. We really created a buzz, and it shows that here at Auraria,
students have a lot of power. If we care about something like
sustainability, we can really make it happen. Students are starting to
be able to rally around this and create an identity on this campus that
traditionally has not really been there."
That sentiment is echoed by Ron Miller, a product developer in Xcel's
marketing group who developed the Solar Rewards Program: "It's in a
great location for a lot of people in the downtown area to see the
panels," he says. "The students have done a superb job of marshaling
support. They've gone to bat to make this a reality."
Those students, 3 Phases and Xcel planned to announce the project in
February and start construction this summer. They were even talking
about ways to create an educational component and put real-time
monitors on campus so that students could track how much energy was
being generated. But they kept hitting delays, and then on March 9,
Richard Mignogna, a PUC engineer, testified to the commission that
staff was concerned about Xcel's Solar*Rewards program. He said they
believed Xcel would acquire too many solar renewable-energy credits at
too high a cost too early, and that it could be disastrous to the
future of solar-energy creation in Colorado.
"If the company purchases the amount of solar RECs [renewable-energy
credits] that it has indicated it plans to, it could meet the RES
[renewable-energy standard] clear out to 2016 with RECs acquired in
2006," he wrote. "This would have a deleterious effect on Colorado's
nascent solar industry, creating a downturn rivaling the boom and bust
cycles caused by inconsistent federal subsidies." Mignogna went on to
explain that the goal of the incentive program is to stimulate the
market and support the industry. By offering the incentives all at once
instead of gradually, the program could stifle that growth and
investment. Since solar is currently the most expensive form of
electric generation, the idea is that over time, as the technology and
competition increase, the cost would go down and the need for
incentives would diminish.
However, Tom Henley, a spokesman with Xcel, points out that while the
company is going to be seven years early when it meets its 10 percent
renewable-energy standard at the end of this year, the company will
have done so while only increasing customers' bills by six-tenths of 1
percent -- less than the full 1 percent the law authorizes.
Mignogna's recommendation, since Xcel had already made commitments to
bidders such as Auraria, was to "spread the pain among the impacted
parties." He suggested that each of the winning developers be limited
to generating a total of 2 megawatts of energy, even if that developer
won bids on multiple projects. Since 3 Phases Energy had also won a bid
for a separate two-megawatt federal project, such a decision from the
PUC would likely kill its 750 kilowatt (or three-quarters of a
megawatt) Auraria project.
Unprepared to take on an expert analysis of the state's entire solar
industry, the Auraria students decided to react by simply making their
support of the campus project known. "I just know we worked really hard
here," Gavioli says. "It would make a difference in this school
community and the Denver community."
On April 16 Andrew Cepeda took that point directly to a PUC public
hearing, making a plea for all of the pending solar projects to go
forward. Governor Bill Ritter's newly appointed chair of the
three-person commission, Ron Binz, seemed to take Cepeda's testimony
seriously. Binz, a supporter of renewable-energy initiatives and a
former consumer advocate for utility customers, asked Cepeda about the
work he'd done to get the project approved, and inquired about his
studies at Metropolitan State College, congratulating him for his
emphases in philosophy and economics -- two areas Binz has degrees in.
Tim Derrick of 3 Phases also testified that the project at Auraria
would be a "very positive and visible manifestation of a community
benefit project." He said students and staff spent countless hours on
the project and that his company had already invested in it heavily.
"With an arbitrary two-megawatt cap, all this work at Auraria would be
for naught."
The PUC will make its decision on Xcel's plan to comply with Amendment
37 on May 30, and Binz cannot comment on the issue while the matter is
pending. PUC spokesman Terry Bote says the testimony of Mignogna and
other staff will be given the same weight as any other testimony:
"Staff is just one party, with the same rights and responsibilities as
everybody else."
In the meantime, Auraria students are continuing their commitment to
sustainability. On April 25 and 26, they voted to renew their current
Clean Energy Fee of $1 per student per semester, and approved an
increase every year up to $5 per semester in 2010-11. The money will
support the Sustainable Campus Program, which aims to increase
renewable energy on campus, improve the energy efficiency of buildings,
expand recycling and reduce waste. "Students overwhelmingly passed the
fee," Fraser says. "I think the students are fantastic for being
responsible. Sustainability is this generation's issue. I'm pretty
proud of them."
While Greenprint Denver tries to create a buzz about sustainability,
Auraria students may soon give Hickenlooper the most visible green
project his city has ever seen.